Wednesday, May 7, 2014

Final research paper

Dru McInerney
Final research paper
Government 490
Char Miller






 Monetary value of laundered cocaine narco-dollars creating successful Latino community in the United States.


Outline


Overview

A: Beginnings and rise of cocaine smuggling from South America

B: Evolution of Cocaine Money laundering

C: Effects of Laundered Narco-Dollars on Miami’s economy

D: Prospering Latino Community

Conclusion






















Overview
When you talk about laundered drug money, you often think of the violence of the drug trade. The violence associated with drug cartels from South and Central America. The money made and laundered from drug trade (narco-dollars) is considered blood money. However, if looked at more closely could these narco-dollars have a positive effect when they are being pumped back into local economies?
Lets take Miami, Florida in the 1980’s for example. Miami pre 1980’s was a small quaint city that was known for vacationing. Enter into the early 1990’s Miami is a booming economic city. This can be accredited to large amounts of narco-dollars coming from the cocaine trade with Colombia. When these cocaine dealers from Colombia began to traffic cocaine through Miami, they started to make small fortunes in narco-dollars. Narco-dollars are a monetary spending that is technically legal in the United States. There is no proof that the money is from illegal entities. So as most drug dealers tend to do, they spend their narco-dollars as fast as they made them. This doesn’t just stimulate the luxury car and jewelry businesses but a large majority of this money is going to real estate. As cocaine became the largest business in Miami behind tourism in the 1980’s [i]the skyline began to rise in the city. With the real estate boom you began to see more Latino’s moving to the city. Most notably more jobs were being made behind the sponsorship of narco-dollars.
You also see a large development of Latino community in Miami as these narco-dollars are being spent. Many people are coming from Southern and Central America to be part of the booming economy. This begins to turn Miami into the hub of Latino culture in North America. This can be compared to the use of religion to bring the Ancient Greek community together. The sponsorship of narco-dollars was able to develop a hub for the Latino community to gather and begin to live the American dream.
To support my argument I have developed four different sections to help the reader understand the dimensions that go into this process. I will first begin with a history of the Cocaine trade. Specifically, I will highlight Cocaine being produced and smuggled from South America to the United States. Secondly, I will explain the history and the process of money being laundered from illegal narco-dollars to legal liquid assets. Third, I will discuss the effects of these narco-dollars and the economies they surround. Finally, I will discuss the Latino communities and how they form a place of communal belonging in this economy.

A: The Rise of Cocaine Production and Smuggling from South America
In the year 1996 the Colombian Government Estimated a total of 67,000 hectares of the coca plant were produced. To put this into perspective, one coca plant can be produced in to 800 grams of cocaine.[ii] The process consists of a large majority of raw product being transferred to a refinery and then converted to paste. From there it is sent to a factory be converted to a final product. The current statistics on Cocaine production are daunting. However, Cocaine comes from relatively modest production, stemming from the turn of 19th century.
            Pre 1940’s, cocaine was a small business that was mostly run in the Andean mountain region. The country that produced the most coca leaf product was Peru. The Peruvian government of that time allowed small factories to produce this product. Cocaine had a limited usage in wealthy countries so it did not have a high demand. In 1950, Peruvian government would make the manufacturing of cocaine illegal. This would not stop the small factories and the several smugglers from operating. [iii]
            Pre World War 2 cocaine was generally an accepted drug in South America. This would all change post World War 2 when the spread of American influence would arrive in South American Countries. During the late 1940’s and early 1950’s Cuba specifically became a hotspot for cocaine usage and smuggling. There was a culture spreading in Havana. Havana was place of freedom and fun.  Havana would consume large amounts of cocaine and even experiment in growing it. By the time of the Cuban revolution Havana had become the hub of cocaine culture. During the Cuban revolution when Fidel Castro came to power most of the Cubans involved in the cocaine smuggling migrated to South America where the product was originating.
            After this migration of Cubans to the Andean region, cocaine production would start to increase. The United States would take notice of this growth in production of cocaine. In response to this growth, the United States would spread their influence with anti-drug control in Bolivia. Bolivia at the time was the largest producer of the coca leaf in the world. After the siege of many coca peasant-farming villages, the peasants would flea to other Andean countries.
With the United States new proactive stance they would confiscate 26 pounds of cocaine at the border in 1967 and increase their findings to 52 pounds in 1969. Although the United States was increasing there efforts on prevention it had become to late. The demand for cocaine usage had increased and in 1971, 436 pounds of cocaine were confiscated at the border[iv].
            The United States may have been able to prevent cocaine growth in Bolivia. However, the migrations of peasants under the influence of Cubans lead to the growth and manufacturing in other countries, primarily Colombia. Cocaine demand has only increased since the 1970’s. The rise of coca leaf production can be seen as a reflection of that. As I earlier noted in 1996 cocaine growth in Colombia had hit an all time high[v].

2. Evolution of Cocaine Money Laundering.
            It has been measured that the international narcotics industry is the largest growth industry in the world.  It has also been estimated that laundered money from the international narcotics industry is the equivalent of more then three times the amount of money circulating in the United States. [vi] When I am discussing laundered money I am referring to money that is made from the narcotics industry that is converted into legal unregulated liquid funds.
            To understand the laundering of narco-dollars in the United States, it is important to understand the history of laundered money legislation in the United States. The United States did not take any domestic action into combating laundered money until 1970. In 1970 congress passed the Business Secrecy Act (BSA). The main function of this act was to open information on transactions in any bank under United States jurisdiction. The main clause in this act was that banks had to disclose information to the IRS on any deposit of $10,000 or more.[vii] The main issue with the BSA was that there was no statute technically making the laundering of money illegal.
            Although the BSA did not actually make the act of laundering illegal it helped expose it. The next step for the United States government would take place in 1986. Congress would pass the Money Laundering Control Act (MLCA); the main supporting function of this act was to make the action of laundering itself illegal. This gave way to new FBI task forces that were able to take down banks and then ultimately take down the cartel members. This act deterred all banks under American jurisdiction from participating in any sort of laundering criminal activity.
            Laundering today still sees two main sources of productivity. The first being front companies. Front companies act as businesses that sell legal product and invest. When narcotics money is put into these businesses they are able to purchase legal products and then sell them. Converting them into legal liquid currency. The second popular way that money is laundered is through boutique banks. Boutique banks are banks set up oversees in countries such as Switzerland where there is no law allowing the United States to view the deposits going in. 
            It is important to understand the history of laundered money in America. You can understand the internal struggle the United State has had with controlling laundered narco-dollars. Most importantly you can see that whether the United State wants laundered money going into its economy or not, is beyond their control. Laundered narco-dollars are still a prevalent piece of infrastructure to many economies throughout the United States, most notably Miami.

C: Effects of Laundered Narco-Dollars on Miami’s Economy

            As previously noted, during the Cuban revolution many big players in the cocaine industry were forced to leave the country. While a large amount went to South America, the others sought refuge in Miami. With connections in South America where the production was taking place, the exiled Cubans began to make Miami, Florida the vocal point of cocaine trafficking into America. From 1960-90 the Miami, Florida economy would grow by over $56 billion[viii]. This economic growth can be directly attributed to laundered narco-dollars.
            There are several problems with measuring the amount of narco-dollars being put into Miami’s economy. The biggest of which, there is no way to get exact figures. The whole point of laundering money is so that it appears to be legal. The best that can be done is to research some areas and make estimates in others. You can take money transferred to Miami bank accounts from questionable offshore banks that are notorious for laundering. The majority of this money may be laundered. However, the margin of error may be large.
            Regardless of the challenges standing in the way, estimates where made in 1988. The total amount of money transferred from Panama banks to Miami accounts was roughly $10 billion[ix]. A good amount of this money may come from legitimate business. 1988 it was estimated that 400 metric tons of cocaine were manufactured and transported across the border to Miami. 90 tons are on the books as being confiscated by customs. This leaves 310 tons of cocaine successfully being smuggled across the border[x]. 310 tons of cocaine is estimated as being $4 billion dollars in laundered narco-dollars.[xi]
With estimated $4 billion being put into the economy annually, Miami has prospered into the North American hub of Latin culture. With this, many businesses desire to expand to the Latino markets and have moved their headquarters down to Miami. There is 352 multinational companies based in Miami, 70% of the companies were started after 1980[xii].  Additionally, with the large amounts of money laundering, many banks have set up shop in Miami. Miami is third to New York City and Los Angeles in number of international banks.[xiii]
With additions of laundered narco-dollars and Latin culture Miami has become a model for an international economic hub. In 1980 when America was at a low point for unemployment, Miami was able to stay 2% under the national unemployment rate.[xiv]Since the boom of cocaine and trafficking through Miami in the 1970’s the city has steadily grown and prospered economically.


D: Prospering Latino Community

           
In the 1960’s before Miami’s cocaine boom, the Latino population was at a mere 5%. Looking at the most current United States census the Latino population of Miami stands at 66%[xv]. And over 50% of this Latino population was not born in the United States[xvi]. This large amount of growth can be attested to Latino immigrants seeking to advance their economic worth.
With large percentages of Latin Americans in Miami, a new cultural wave has set through the city. Other Latino populations have struggled to find a home in the America South. Many of the southern states are not welcoming to the Latino population and there community. Southern states such as Georgia have attempted to pass state legislation that would make children born in America with immigrant parents unable to gain citizenship. Miami, unlike other southern American cities has created a safe haven for there community. Currently many state and federal representatives in the area are of Latino descent. Miami also has increased numbers of state and federal employees in the area. Miami has truly developed a strong Latino community.

Conclusion
Miami becoming the hub of Latino culture in America can be attested to its economic prosperity. Much of this economic prosperity is a result of the laundered narco-dollars being put back into the economy. And finally the majority of these narco-dollars are derived from cocaine production in Colombia and the Andean regions of South America. Illegal cocaine production and smuggling through Miami has resulted in a prosperous Latino community.


           
           




[i] Economist, "Foundations For the Future." 
[ii] Guizado, Alvaro “Perspectives on Narcotics Trafficking in Colombia”
[iii] Gootenburg, Paul, THE “PRE-COLOMBIAN” ERA OF DRUG TRAFFICKING
[iv] Gootenburg, Paul, THE “PRE-COLOMBIAN” ERA OF DRUG TRAFFICKING
[v] Guizado, Alvaro “Perspectives on Narcotics Trafficking in Colombia”
[vi] : O'brian, Patrick,Tracking Narco-Dollars: The Evolution of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War
[vii] O'brian, Patrick, “Tracking Narco-Dollars: The Evolution of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War“

[viii] Nijman, Jan, “Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine”
[ix] Grosse, Robert"The Economic Impact of Andean Cocaine Traffic on Florida."

[x] Grosse, Robert"The Economic Impact of Andean Cocaine Traffic on Florida."

[xi] Grosse, Robert"The Economic Impact of Andean Cocaine Traffic on Florida."(

[xii] Nijman, Jan, “Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine”
[xiii] Nijman, Jan, “Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine”
[xiv] Economist, "Foundations For the Future." 

[xv] Miami City, Florida." American Fact Finder. United States Census

[xvi] Miami City, Florida." American Fact Finder. United States Census





Works Cited

1.
Bartilow, Horace. "Free Traders and Drug Smugglers: The Effects of Trade Openness on States' Ability to Combat Drug Trafficking." Latin American Politics and Society. 51.2 (2009): 117-145. Print.

2.
              "Foundations For the Future." Economist [London] 16 10 1982, 7259 n. pag. Print

3.
Gilbert, Alan. "The Latin American City ." Canadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies. 24.47 (1999): n. page. Print.

4.           
  Gootenburg, Paul. "The "Pre-Colombian" Era of Drug Trafficking in the Americas." Academy of American Franciscan History. 64.2 (2007): 133-176. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.

5.             
Grosse, Robert. "The Economic Impact of Andean Cocaine Traffic on Florida." Journal of Inter-American Studies and World Affairs. 32.4 (1990): 137-159. Web. 17 Mar. 2014.

6.
Guizado, Alvaro. "Perspectives on Narcotics Trafficking in Colombia." International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society. 14.1 (200): n. page. Print.

7.
                  "Miami City, Florida." American Fact Finder. United States Census, n.d. Web. 25 Mar 2014.

8.            
 Nijman, Jan. "Globalization to a Latin Beat: The Miami Growth Machine." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 551 (1997): 164-177. Print.

9.
O'brian, Patrick. "Tracking Narco-Dollars: The Evolution of a Potent Weapon in the Drug War." University of Miami Inter-American Law Review. 21.3 (1990): n. page. Print.

10.
Salama, Pierre. "The Economy of Narco-Dollars: From Production to Recycling of Earnings."nternational Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society . 14.1 (2000): 183-203. Print.

11.
Smith, Barbara. "We're Here to Sta'y: Economic Restructuring, Latino Migration and Place-Making in the US South." Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers . 33.1 (2006): n. page. Print.

12.
Whitten, Norman. "Power Structure and Sociocultural Change in Latin American Communities." Oxford University Press 43: 320-329. JStor. Web. 7 Apr. 2014.








.


No comments:

Post a Comment